MICH vs VBLD - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MICH and VBLD. VBLD has the lower management fee at 0.46% a year and VBLD offers the higher at 2.33%.

Lower fee

VBLD 0.46% p.a.

Higher yield

VBLD 2.33%

Larger fund

VBLD $648m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)	VBLD Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	Vanguard
Tracks index	S&P Global Infrastructure Index (AUD Hedged)	FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure Index
Categories	Intl, Thematic, Active	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	2016 (10 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	—	$648m
Cost & income
Management fee	1.05%	0.46%
Dividend yield	—	2.33%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	20%	—
Tax drag	0.48%	0.75%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	-1.6% net
3-year return	—	9.6% net
5-year return	—	6.5% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	10.8%
Volatility (5y)	—	10.9%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.52
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.32
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)

A 1.05% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full MICH analysis →

VBLD Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (246th of 318).

Full VBLD analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MICH vs VBLD?

MICH and VBLD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VBLD carries the lower management fee (0.46%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MICH vs VBLD?

VBLD has the lower management fee at 0.46% a year, versus MICH 1.05%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

VBLD pays the higher at 2.33%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VBLD is the larger fund by assets ($648m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MICH vs IFRA MICH vs GLIN MICH vs CIIH MICH vs PAVE MICH vs RIIF MICH vs GHIF VBLD vs IFRA VBLD vs GLIN

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.