At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
LEVR
First Sentier Geared Australian Share Complex ETF
|
GMVW
VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Complex ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
—
|
VanEck
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
—
|
| Categories |
AU, Geared, Active
|
AU, Geared, Factor, Active
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$235m
|
$39m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
2.38%
|
0.35%
|
| Dividend yield |
0.59%
|
—
|
| Franking |
75%
|
80%
|
| Turnover |
45%
|
25%
|
| Tax drag | 1.14% | 0.6% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
-10.7%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
LEVR and GMVW are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GMVW carries the lower management fee (0.35%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
GMVW has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus LEVR 2.38%.
LEVR pays the higher at 0.59%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
LEVR is the larger fund by assets ($235m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.