Grow it · ETFs

JPEQ vs QMAX

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing JPEQ and QMAX. JPEQ has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year.
Lower fee
JPEQ 0.4% p.a.
Larger fund
JPEQ $91m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric JPEQ
JPMorgan US 100Q Equity Premium Income Active ETF
QMAX
BetaShares Nasdaq 100 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
Tracks index
Categories
Intl, Dividend, Tech, US, Active
Intl, Dividend, Tech, US, Active
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$91m
$33m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.4%
0.68%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
Tax drag
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

JPEQ JPMorgan US 100Q Equity Premium Income Active ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
QMAX BetaShares Nasdaq 100 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.55%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between JPEQ vs QMAX?

JPEQ and QMAX are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. JPEQ carries the lower management fee (0.4%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - JPEQ vs QMAX?

JPEQ has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year, versus QMAX 0.68%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

JPEQ is the larger fund by assets ($91m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?