At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
JNDQ
BetaShares Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF
|
NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
HNDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 Currency Hedged ETF
|
FANG
Global X FANG+ ETF
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
Global X
|
| Tracks index |
Nasdaq Next Generation 100 Index
|
NASDAQ-100 Index
|
NASDAQ-100 Index (AUD Hedged)
|
NYSE FANG+ Index
|
| Categories |
US, Growth, Tech
|
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
|
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
|
US, Tech, Growth, Thematic
|
| Listed since |
2024 (2 yrs)
|
2015 (11 yrs)
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$14m
|
$9.6bn
|
$9.6bn
|
$1.6bn
|
| Cost & income | ||||
| Management fee |
0.48%
|
0.48%
|
0.51%
|
0.35%
|
| Dividend yield |
5.24%
|
1.54%
|
2.22%
|
7.01%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
15%
|
15%
|
20%
|
30%
|
| Tax drag | 2.04% | 0.85% | 1.19% | 2.96% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|||
| 1-year return |
21.3%
net
|
11.7%
net
|
20.7%
net
|
3.9%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
20%
net
|
20.1%
net
|
27.1%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
14.8%
net
|
11.6%
net
|
20.3%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
20.9%
net
|
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
16.2%
|
17.4%
|
21.6%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
18.3%
|
20.9%
|
24.6%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
15.9%
|
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
0.96
|
0.91
|
1.04
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
0.68
|
0.48
|
0.75
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
1.14
|
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-13% returns over 1 year (39th of 308 ETFs we track).
- Pays a useful 5.24% income yield.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: FANG and TECH.
- Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 108 ETFs we track).
- Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.14).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.
- Top-11% returns over 3 years (25th of 226 ETFs we track).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.
- Top-2% returns over 5 years (3rd of 188 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNDQ, NDQ, HNDQ, and FANG are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FANG carries the lowest management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, FANG has delivered the highest total return (20.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
FANG has the lowest management fee at 0.35% a year, versus JNDQ 0.48%, NDQ 0.48%, and HNDQ 0.51%.
Over the past 5 years, FANG has delivered the highest total return at 20.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
FANG pays the highest at 7.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
NDQ is the largest fund by assets ($9.6bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.