At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
|
IXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
iShares
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
S&P Global 1200 Health Care Sector Index
|
S&P Global 1200 Consumer Staples Sector Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Market-Cap
|
Intl, Thematic, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
2007 (19 yrs)
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$1.5bn
|
$128m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.4%
|
0.4%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.56%
|
2.11%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
5%
|
5%
|
| Tax drag | 0.62% | 0.8% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
11.2%
net
|
-1.2%
net
|
| 3-year return |
6.1%
net
|
4.4%
net
|
| 5-year return |
6.1%
net
|
4.7%
net
|
| 10-year return |
9.8%
net
|
6%
net
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
12.6%
|
9.2%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
12.2%
|
10.8%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
11.5%
|
10.7%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.2
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.27
|
0.16
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.67
|
0.39
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Has lagged most peers over 3 years (176th of 236).
- Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Has lagged most peers over 3 years (194th of 236).
Frequently Asked Questions
IXJ and IXI are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IXJ carries the lower management fee (0.4%). Over 10 years, IXJ has delivered the higher total return (9.8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IXJ has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year, versus IXI 0.4%.
Over the past 10 years, IXJ has delivered the higher total return at 9.8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
IXI pays the higher at 2.11%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IXJ is the larger fund by assets ($1.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.