At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
IJH
iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
U100
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
iShares
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
S&P MidCap 400 Index
|
S&P 500 Equal Weight Index
|
| Categories |
US, Market-Cap
|
US, Factor, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth
|
| Listed since |
2007 (19 yrs)
|
2025 (1 yr)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$483m
|
$104m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.07%
|
0.18%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.49%
|
12.01%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
15%
|
20%
|
| Tax drag | 0.84% | 4.32% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
6.2%
net
|
13.2%
net
|
| 3-year return |
11.4%
net
|
21.8%
net
|
| 5-year return |
8.6%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
11.3%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
14.2%
|
18.2%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
14.6%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
15.1%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.55
|
0.96
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.41
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.64
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS and IVV.
- Top-12% returns over 3 years (28th of 236 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS, IVV, and IJH.
Frequently Asked Questions
IJH and U100 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IJH carries the lower management fee (0.07%). Over 3 years, U100 has delivered the higher total return (21.8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IJH has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus U100 0.18%.
Over the past 3 years, U100 has delivered the higher total return at 21.8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
U100 pays the higher at 12.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IJH is the larger fund by assets ($483m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.