Grow it · ETFs

IEM vs EMKT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IEM and EMKT. EMKT has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, EMKT has the higher 5 years return at 15.5% a year, and EMKT offers the higher at 13.49%.
Lower fee
EMKT 0.69% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
EMKT 15.5% p.a.
Higher yield
EMKT 13.49%
Higher risk-adjusted
EMKT Sharpe 0.82 (5y)
Lower volatility
IEM 13.7% (5y)
Larger fund
IEM $1.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
EMKT
VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
VanEck
Tracks index
MSCI Emerging Markets Index
MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index
Categories
EM, Market-Cap
EM, Factor
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1.7bn
$731m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.71%
0.69%
Dividend yield
1.45%
13.49%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
Tax drag 0.46% 5.04%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
24.5%
net
35.6%
net
3-year return
16.8%
net
24.3%
net
5-year return
8%
net
15.5%
net
10-year return
9.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
13.3%
16.8%
Volatility (5y)
13.7%
15.2%
Volatility (10y)
12.2%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.93
1.15
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.4
0.82
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.6
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
  • Top-10% returns over 1 year (30th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • A 0.71% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
EMKT VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 5 years (12th of 188 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.39%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IEM vs EMKT?

IEM and EMKT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. EMKT carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return (15.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IEM vs EMKT?

EMKT has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus IEM 0.71%.

Which has performed higher - IEM vs EMKT?

Over the past 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return at 15.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

EMKT pays the higher at 13.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IEM is the larger fund by assets ($1.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?