At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
IAF
iShares Core Composite Bond ETF
|
RMBS
VanEck Australian RMBS ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
iShares
|
VanEck
|
| Tracks index |
Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index
|
—
|
| Categories |
AU, Bonds
|
Bonds, AU
|
| Listed since |
2012 (14 yrs)
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$3.8bn
|
$32m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.1%
|
0.29%
|
| Dividend yield |
3.15%
|
4.86%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
35%
|
25%
|
| Tax drag | 1.85% | 2.16% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
1%
net
|
4.5%
net
|
| 3-year return |
3.6%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
-0.2%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
1.5%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
4%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
5.4%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
4.5%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Low volatility (4.45% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
- Has lagged most peers over 10 years (97th of 108).
- Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Pays a useful 4.86% income yield.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and OZBD.
Frequently Asked Questions
IAF and RMBS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAF carries the lower management fee (0.1%). Over 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return (4.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IAF has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, versus RMBS 0.29%.
Over the past 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return at 4.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
RMBS pays the higher at 4.86%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IAF is the larger fund by assets ($3.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.