IAF vs OZBD vs RMBS vs VAF - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing IAF, OZBD, RMBS, and VAF. IAF has the lowest management fee at 0.1% a year, IAF has the highest 10 years return at 1.5% a year, and RMBS offers the highest at 4.86%.

Lowest fee

IAF 0.1% p.a.

Highest 10 years return

IAF 1.5% p.a.

Highest yield

RMBS 4.86%

Lowest volatility

IAF 4.5% (10y)

Largest fund

VAF $3.8bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	IAF iShares Core Composite Bond ETF	OZBD BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF	RMBS VanEck Australian RMBS ETF	VAF Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	BetaShares	VanEck	Vanguard
Tracks index	Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index	Solactive Australian Composite Bond Select Index	—	Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index
Categories	AU, Bonds	AU, Bonds	Bonds, AU	AU, Bonds
Listed since	2012 (14 yrs)	2022 (4 yrs)	—	2012 (14 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$3.8bn	$1.4bn	$32m	$3.8bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.1%	0.19%	0.29%	0.1%
Dividend yield	3.15%	4.23%	4.86%	3.24%
Franking	0%	0%	0%	0%
Turnover	35%	25%	25%	30%
Tax drag	1.85%	1.95%	2.16%	1.76%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	1% net	1.1% net	4.5% net	1% net
3-year return	3.6% net	4.3% net	—	3.6% net
5-year return	-0.2% net	—	—	-0.2% net
10-year return	1.5% net	—	—	1.5% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	4%	4.8%	—	4%
Volatility (5y)	5.4%	—	—	5.4%
Volatility (10y)	4.5%	—	—	4.5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.14	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IAF iShares Core Composite Bond ETF

Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Low volatility (4.45% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.

Has lagged most peers over 10 years (97th of 108).

Full IAF analysis →

OZBD BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF

Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4.23% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 3 years (185th of 226).

Full OZBD analysis →

RMBS VanEck Australian RMBS ETF

Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4.86% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and OZBD.

Full RMBS analysis →

VAF Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF

Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Low volatility (4.45% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.

Has lagged most peers over 10 years (97th of 108).

Full VAF analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IAF vs OZBD vs RMBS vs VAF?

IAF, OZBD, RMBS, and VAF are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAF carries the lowest management fee (0.1%). Over 10 years, IAF has delivered the highest total return (1.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - IAF vs OZBD vs RMBS vs VAF?

IAF has the lowest management fee at 0.1% a year, versus OZBD 0.19%, RMBS 0.29%, and VAF 0.1%.

Which has performed highest - IAF vs OZBD vs RMBS vs VAF?

Over the past 10 years, IAF has delivered the highest total return at 1.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

RMBS pays the highest at 4.86%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

VAF is the largest fund by assets ($3.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

IAF vs VGB IAF vs BNDS IAF vs VCF IAF vs VIF IAF vs ILB OZBD vs BNDS OZBD vs VGB OZBD vs BSUB

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.