HYGG vs WCMQ vs NDQ vs FANG - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing HYGG, WCMQ, NDQ, and FANG. FANG has the lowest management fee at 0.35% a year, FANG has the highest 5 years return at 20.3% a year, and FANG offers the highest at 7.01%.

Lowest fee

FANG 0.35% p.a.

Highest 5 years return

FANG 20.3% p.a.

Highest yield

FANG 7.01%

Highest risk-adjusted

FANG Sharpe 0.75 (5y)

Lowest volatility

NDQ 18.3% (5y)

Largest fund

NDQ $9.6bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	HYGG Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF	WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF	NDQ BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF	FANG Global X FANG+ ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	—	BetaShares	Global X
Tracks index	MSCI World ex Australia Index	MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index	NASDAQ-100 Index	NYSE FANG+ Index
Categories	Intl, Growth	Intl, Growth, Quality, Active	US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap	US, Tech, Growth, Thematic
Listed since	2022 (4 yrs)	2020 (6 yrs)	2015 (11 yrs)	2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	—	—	$9.6bn	$1.6bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.7%	1.35%	0.48%	0.35%
Dividend yield	—	—	1.54%	7.01%
Franking	0%	0%	0%	0%
Turnover	15%	20%	15%	30%
Tax drag	0.36%	0.48%	0.85%	2.96%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	—	11.7% net	3.9% net
3-year return	—	—	20% net	27.1% net
5-year return	—	—	14.8% net	20.3% net
10-year return	—	—	20.9% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—	16.2%	21.6%
Volatility (5y)	—	—	18.3%	24.6%
Volatility (10y)	—	—	15.9%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—	0.96	1.04
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—	0.68	0.75
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—	1.14	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

HYGG Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.53%.

Full HYGG analysis →

WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF

A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full WCMQ analysis →

NDQ BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 108 ETFs we track).
Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.14).

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.

Full NDQ analysis →

FANG Global X FANG+ ETF

Top-2% returns over 5 years (3rd of 188 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full FANG analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between HYGG vs WCMQ vs NDQ vs FANG?

HYGG, WCMQ, NDQ, and FANG are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FANG carries the lowest management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, FANG has delivered the highest total return (20.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - HYGG vs WCMQ vs NDQ vs FANG?

FANG has the lowest management fee at 0.35% a year, versus HYGG 0.7%, WCMQ 1.35%, and NDQ 0.48%.

Which has performed highest - HYGG vs WCMQ vs NDQ vs FANG?

Over the past 5 years, FANG has delivered the highest total return at 20.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

FANG pays the highest at 7.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

NDQ is the largest fund by assets ($9.6bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

HYGG vs TECH HYGG vs HHIF HYGG vs FRGG HYGG vs LHGG WCMQ vs QLTY WCMQ vs QUAL WCMQ vs GLOB WCMQ vs HHIF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.