Grow it · ETFs

HYGG vs WCMQ

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing HYGG and WCMQ. HYGG has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year.
Lower fee
HYGG 0.7% p.a.

Side-by-side comparison

Metric HYGG
Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF
WCMQ
WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
MSCI World ex Australia Index
MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index
Categories
Intl, Growth
Intl, Growth, Quality, Active
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
Cost & income
Management fee
0.7%
1.35%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
15%
20%
Tax drag 0.36% 0.48%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

HYGG Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.53%.
WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
  • A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between HYGG vs WCMQ?

HYGG and WCMQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. HYGG carries the lower management fee (0.7%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - HYGG vs WCMQ?

HYGG has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year, versus WCMQ 1.35%.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?