Grow it · ETFs

HJZP vs GLPR

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing HJZP and GLPR. GLPR has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year and GLPR offers the higher at 5.35%.
Lower fee
GLPR 0.15% p.a.
Higher yield
GLPR 5.35%
Larger fund
GLPR $689m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric HJZP
Hejaz Property Fund Active ETF
GLPR
iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
iShares
Tracks index
—
—
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Active
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
—
—
Fund size (AUM)
$5m
$689m
Cost & income
Management fee
1.5%
0.15%
Dividend yield
—
5.35%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
—
Tax drag — 1.71%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
—
4.5%
net
3-year return
—
8.8%
net
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
14.7%
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
0.37
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

HJZP Hejaz Property Fund Active ETF
  • A 1.5% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
GLPR iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 5.35% income yield.
  • Weak risk-adjusted returns (3-year Sharpe ratio 0.37).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between HJZP vs GLPR?

HJZP and GLPR are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLPR carries the lower management fee (0.15%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - HJZP vs GLPR?

GLPR has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus HJZP 1.5%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GLPR pays the higher at 5.35%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GLPR is the larger fund by assets ($689m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?