At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
HACK
BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF
|
RBTZ
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index
|
INDXX Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Tech
|
Intl, Thematic, Tech
|
| Listed since |
2016 (10 yrs)
|
2018 (8 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$1.7bn
|
$296m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.67%
|
0.57%
|
| Dividend yield |
3.26%
|
0.05%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
30%
|
35%
|
| Tax drag | 1.76% | 0.86% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
29.1%
net
|
-4.9%
net
|
| 3-year return |
28.2%
net
|
10%
net
|
| 5-year return |
17.1%
net
|
0.2%
net
|
| 10-year return |
19.3%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
23.8%
|
19.9%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
22.3%
|
22.3%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
19.9%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.99
|
0.37
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.67
|
0.13
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.88
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
HACK and RBTZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. RBTZ carries the lower management fee (0.57%). Over 5 years, HACK has delivered the higher total return (17.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
RBTZ has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year, versus HACK 0.67%.
Over the past 5 years, HACK has delivered the higher total return at 17.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
HACK pays the higher at 3.26%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
HACK is the larger fund by assets ($1.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.