Grow it · ETFs

GRNV vs E200

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GRNV and E200. E200 has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, E200 has the higher 5 years return at 8.3% a year, and E200 offers the higher at 4.39%.
Lower fee
E200 0.05% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
E200 8.3% p.a.
Higher yield
E200 4.39%
Higher risk-adjusted
E200 Sharpe 0.46 (5y)
Lower volatility
E200 12% (5y)
Larger fund
E200 $404m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GRNV
VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF
E200
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
State Street
Tracks index
MSCI Australia IMI Select SRI Capped 5% Index
S&P/ASX 200 ESG Index
Categories
AU, ESG
AU, Thematic, ESG
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$240m
$404m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.35%
0.05%
Dividend yield
3.68%
4.39%
Franking
75%
75%
Turnover
30%
8%
Tax drag 1.09% 0.64%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-4.7%
net
6.8%
net
3-year return
7.4%
net
10.4%
net
5-year return
5.5%
net
8.3%
net
10-year return
6.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
13.1%
11%
Volatility (5y)
14.4%
12%
Volatility (10y)
14.6%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.3
0.59
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.22
0.46
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.33
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GRNV VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 3.68% income yield.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (276th of 308).
E200 State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.05% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.39% income yield.
  • Weak risk-adjusted returns (5-year Sharpe ratio 0.46).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GRNV vs E200?

GRNV and E200 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. E200 carries the lower management fee (0.05%). Over 5 years, E200 has delivered the higher total return (8.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GRNV vs E200?

E200 has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, versus GRNV 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - GRNV vs E200?

Over the past 5 years, E200 has delivered the higher total return at 8.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

E200 pays the higher at 4.39%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

E200 is the larger fund by assets ($404m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?