At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
GRIN
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF
|
IIND
BetaShares India Quality ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
VanEck
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
Solactive India Quality Select Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Growth, EM
|
Asia, Quality, Factor, EM
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$15m
|
$177m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.75%
|
0.8%
|
| Dividend yield |
0.47%
|
0.82%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 0.15% | 0.26% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
-7%
net
|
-17.2%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
0.3%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
2.7%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
13.9%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
14.1%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
GRIN and IIND are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GRIN carries the lower management fee (0.75%). Over 1 year, GRIN has delivered the higher total return (-7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
GRIN has the lower management fee at 0.75% a year, versus IIND 0.8%.
Over the past 1 year, GRIN has delivered the higher total return at -7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
IIND pays the higher at 0.82%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IIND is the larger fund by assets ($177m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.