At a glance
Comparing GOLD and ETPMAG. GOLD has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year.
Lower fee
GOLD
0.4% p.a.
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
GOLD
Global X Physical Gold
|
ETPMAG
Global X Physical Silver
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
Global X
|
Global X
|
| Tracks index |
LBMA Gold Price
|
LBMA Silver Price
|
| Categories |
Commodities
|
Commodities
|
| Listed since |
2003 (23 yrs)
|
2003 (23 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
—
|
—
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.4%
|
0.49%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
0%
|
0%
|
| Tax drag | 0% | 0% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
GOLD
Global X Physical Gold
- Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: PMGOLD.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between GOLD vs ETPMAG?
GOLD and ETPMAG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GOLD carries the lower management fee (0.4%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
Which has the lower fees - GOLD vs ETPMAG?
GOLD has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year, versus ETPMAG 0.49%.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.