Grow it · ETFs

GOAT vs QLTY

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GOAT and QLTY. QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, QLTY has the higher 5 years return at 8.9% a year, and GOAT offers the higher at 10.58%.
Lower fee
QLTY 0.35% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
QLTY 8.9% p.a.
Higher yield
GOAT 10.58%
Higher risk-adjusted
QLTY Sharpe 0.48 (5y)
Lower volatility
GOAT 11.6% (5y)
Larger fund
QLTY $992m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GOAT
VanEck Morningstar International Wide Moat ETF
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
Morningstar Developed Markets ex-Australia Wide Moat Focus Index
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
Categories
Intl, Factor, Quality, Value
Intl, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2020 (6 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$66m
$992m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.49%
0.35%
Dividend yield
10.58%
3.41%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
20%
Tax drag 4.23% 1.57%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
0.7%
net
6.5%
net
3-year return
6.9%
net
13.3%
net
5-year return
6.1%
net
8.9%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
11.3%
10.9%
Volatility (5y)
11.6%
13%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.28
0.84
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.3
0.48
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GOAT VanEck Morningstar International Wide Moat ETF
  • High 10.58% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (250th of 308).
QLTY BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GOAT vs QLTY?

GOAT and QLTY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, QLTY has delivered the higher total return (8.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GOAT vs QLTY?

QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus GOAT 0.49%.

Which has performed higher - GOAT vs QLTY?

Over the past 5 years, QLTY has delivered the higher total return at 8.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GOAT pays the higher at 10.58%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QLTY is the larger fund by assets ($992m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?