GMTL vs VOLT vs WIRE vs XMET - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GMTL, VOLT, WIRE, and XMET. VOLT has the lowest management fee at 0.49% a year, WIRE has the highest 3 years return at 31.3% a year, and GMTL offers the highest at 9.46%.

Lowest fee

VOLT 0.49% p.a.

Highest 3 years return

WIRE 31.3% p.a.

Highest yield

GMTL 9.46%

Highest risk-adjusted

WIRE Sharpe 0.95 (3y)

Lowest volatility

GMTL 26.4% (3y)

Largest fund

WIRE $909m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GMTL Global X Green Metal Miners ETF	VOLT ETFS Global Lithium Miners ETF	WIRE Global X Copper Miners ETF	XMET BetaShares Energy Transition Metals ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Global X	—	Global X	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	—	Solactive Global Copper Miners Index	—
Categories	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic, Commodities	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	—	—	2021 (5 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$12m	$1m	$909m	$139m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.69%	0.49%	0.65%	0.69%
Dividend yield	9.46%	—	3.01%	3.83%
Franking	0%	0%	0%	0%
Turnover	—	—	20%	—
Tax drag	3.03%	—	1.44%	1.23%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	17% net	—	38.4% net	26.7% net
3-year return	16.5% net	—	31.3% net	25.6% net
5-year return	—	—	—	—
10-year return	—	—	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	26.4%	—	28.9%	30.2%
Volatility (5y)	—	—	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.55	—	0.95	0.77
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GMTL Global X Green Metal Miners ETF

Top-16% returns over 1 year (51st of 318 ETFs we track).
High 9.46% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full GMTL analysis →

VOLT ETFS Global Lithium Miners ETF

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full VOLT analysis →

WIRE Global X Copper Miners ETF

Top-4% returns over 3 years (10th of 236 ETFs we track).

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full WIRE analysis →

XMET BetaShares Energy Transition Metals ETF

Top-7% returns over 1 year (23rd of 318 ETFs we track).
Pays a useful 3.83% income yield.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full XMET analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GMTL vs VOLT vs WIRE vs XMET?

GMTL, VOLT, WIRE, and XMET are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VOLT carries the lowest management fee (0.49%). Over 3 years, WIRE has delivered the highest total return (31.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - GMTL vs VOLT vs WIRE vs XMET?

VOLT has the lowest management fee at 0.49% a year, versus GMTL 0.69%, WIRE 0.65%, and XMET 0.69%.

Which has performed highest - GMTL vs VOLT vs WIRE vs XMET?

Over the past 3 years, WIRE has delivered the highest total return at 31.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

GMTL pays the highest at 9.46%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

WIRE is the largest fund by assets ($909m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GMTL vs ACDC GMTL vs CPPR VOLT vs ACDC WIRE vs QRE WIRE vs ACDC WIRE vs URNM WIRE vs FUEL WIRE vs ETPMAG

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.