GHIF vs IFRA - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GHIF and IFRA. IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, GHIF has the higher 5 years return at 7.9% a year, and GHIF offers the higher at 4.58%.

Lower fee

IFRA 0.2% p.a.

Higher 5 years return

GHIF 7.9% p.a.

Higher yield

GHIF 4.58%

Higher risk-adjusted

GHIF Sharpe 0.38 (5y)

Lower volatility

IFRA 12.7% (5y)

Larger fund

IFRA $2.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GHIF Ausbil Global Essential Infrastructure Fund (Hedged) - Active ETF	IFRA VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	VanEck
Tracks index	—	FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure 50/50 Hedged into AUD Index
Categories	Intl, Thematic, Active	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	—	2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$289m	$2.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee	1%	0.2%
Dividend yield	4.58%	2.97%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	15%
Tax drag	1.47%	1.31%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	17% net	15.8% net
3-year return	10.9% net	11.7% net
5-year return	7.9% net	7.5% net
10-year return	—	7% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	12.4%	11%
Volatility (5y)	13.9%	12.7%
Volatility (10y)	—	12.6%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.57	0.7
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.38	0.38
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	0.43
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GHIF Ausbil Global Essential Infrastructure Fund (Hedged) - Active ETF

Top-22% returns over 1 year (67th of 308 ETFs we track).
Pays a useful 4.58% income yield.

A 1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full GHIF analysis →

IFRA VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Top-23% returns over 1 year (72nd of 308 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.2% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: TOLL and GLIN.

Full IFRA analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GHIF vs IFRA?

GHIF and IFRA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IFRA carries the lower management fee (0.2%). Over 5 years, GHIF has delivered the higher total return (7.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GHIF vs IFRA?

IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, versus GHIF 1%.

Which has performed higher - GHIF vs IFRA?

Over the past 5 years, GHIF has delivered the higher total return at 7.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GHIF pays the higher at 4.58%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IFRA is the larger fund by assets ($2.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GHIF vs GLIN GHIF vs MICH GHIF vs VBLD IFRA vs GLIN IFRA vs MICH IFRA vs CIIH IFRA vs PAVE IFRA vs RIIF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.