Grow it · ETFs

GEAR vs GMVW

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GEAR and GMVW. GMVW has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year and GEAR offers the higher at 1.85%.
Lower fee
GMVW 0.35% p.a.
Higher yield
GEAR 1.85%
Larger fund
GEAR $572m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GEAR
BetaShares Geared Australian Equity Fund
GMVW
VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Complex ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
VanEck
Tracks index
—
—
Categories
AU, Large-Cap, Geared
AU, Geared, Factor, Active
Listed since
2014 (12 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
$572m
$39m
Cost & income
Management fee
2.23%
0.35%
Dividend yield
1.85%
—
Franking
72%
80%
Turnover
45%
25%
Tax drag 1.28% 0.6%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-1.4%
net
—
3-year return
17.5%
net
—
5-year return
10.4%
net
—
10-year return
12.5%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
24.1%
—
Volatility (5y)
29.1%
—
Volatility (10y)
30.5%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.62
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.37
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.48
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GEAR BetaShares Geared Australian Equity Fund
  • Top-25% returns over 10 years (28th of 110 ETFs we track).
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (242nd of 318).
GMVW VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Complex ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GEAR vs GMVW?

GEAR and GMVW are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GMVW carries the lower management fee (0.35%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GEAR vs GMVW?

GMVW has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus GEAR 2.23%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GEAR pays the higher at 1.85%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GEAR is the larger fund by assets ($572m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?