Grow it · ETFs

GCQF vs MGOC

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GCQF and MGOC. GCQF has the lower management fee at 1.25% a year and GCQF offers the higher at 1.23%.
Lower fee
GCQF 1.25% p.a.
Higher yield
GCQF 1.23%
Larger fund
MGOC $4.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GCQF
GCQ Global Equities Complex ETF
MGOC
Magellan Global Fund (Open Class) Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
—
Tracks index
—
—
Categories
Intl, Active
Intl, Active
Listed since
—
—
Fund size (AUM)
$260m
$4.7bn
Cost & income
Management fee
1.25%
1.35%
Dividend yield
1.23%
—
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
—
Tax drag 0.39% —
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-22.2%
net
—
3-year return
—
—
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
—
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GCQF GCQ Global Equities Complex ETF
  • A 1.25% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
MGOC Magellan Global Fund (Open Class) Active ETF
  • A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GCQF vs MGOC?

GCQF and MGOC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GCQF carries the lower management fee (1.25%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GCQF vs MGOC?

GCQF has the lower management fee at 1.25% a year, versus MGOC 1.35%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GCQF pays the higher at 1.23%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MGOC is the larger fund by assets ($4.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?