Grow it · ETFs

FSML vs MVS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing FSML and MVS. MVS has the lower management fee at 0.49% a year, FSML has the higher 5 years return at 7.6% a year, and FSML offers the higher at 6.1%.
Lower fee
MVS 0.49% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
FSML 7.6% p.a.
Higher yield
FSML 6.1%
Higher risk-adjusted
FSML Sharpe 0.33 (5y)
Lower volatility
FSML 16.9% (5y)
Larger fund
FSML $765m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric FSML
Firetrail Australian Small Companies Fund - Active ETF
MVS
VanEck Small Companies Masters ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
Tracks index
S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index
Categories
AU, Small-Cap
AU, Small-Cap
Listed since
2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$765m
$176m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.85%
0.49%
Dividend yield
6.1%
2.93%
Franking
60%
55%
Turnover
90%
25%
Tax drag 3.05% 1.07%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
10.8%
net
2.6%
net
3-year return
19.1%
net
6.7%
net
5-year return
7.6%
net
2.5%
net
10-year return
4.9%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
15.4%
16.2%
Volatility (5y)
16.9%
17.2%
Volatility (10y)
17.3%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.95
0.23
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.33
0.1
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.24
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

FSML Firetrail Australian Small Companies Fund - Active ETF
  • Top-13% returns over 3 years (29th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 6.1% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 0.85% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
MVS VanEck Small Companies Masters ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (143rd of 188).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between FSML vs MVS?

FSML and MVS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVS carries the lower management fee (0.49%). Over 5 years, FSML has delivered the higher total return (7.6% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - FSML vs MVS?

MVS has the lower management fee at 0.49% a year, versus FSML 0.85%.

Which has performed higher - FSML vs MVS?

Over the past 5 years, FSML has delivered the higher total return at 7.6% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FSML pays the higher at 6.1%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

FSML is the larger fund by assets ($765m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?