At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
ETPMPT
Global X Physical Platinum
|
ETPMPM
Global X Physical Precious Metals Basket
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
Global X
|
Global X
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
—
|
| Categories |
Commodities
|
Commodities
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$88m
|
$140m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.49%
|
0.44%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | — | — |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
ETPMPT and ETPMPM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ETPMPM carries the lower management fee (0.44%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
ETPMPM has the lower management fee at 0.44% a year, versus ETPMPT 0.49%.
ETPMPM is the larger fund by assets ($140m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.