At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
EBND
VanEck Emerging Income Opportunities Active ETF
|
IHEB
iShares J.P.Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
VanEck
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
—
|
| Categories |
Bonds, Intl, Active
|
Bonds, Intl
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$286m
|
$76m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.95%
|
0.53%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
7.32%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | — | 2.34% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
0.4%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
7.7%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
-0.2%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
1.3%
net
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
6.9%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
10.2%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
9.7%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
0.52
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- A 0.95% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
- High 7.32% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Has lagged most peers over 10 years (99th of 110).
Frequently Asked Questions
EBND and IHEB are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IHEB carries the lower management fee (0.53%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IHEB has the lower management fee at 0.53% a year, versus EBND 0.95%.
IHEB pays the higher at 7.32%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
EBND is the larger fund by assets ($286m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.