Grow it · ETFs

DACE vs XX20

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing DACE and XX20. DACE has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year and XX20 offers the higher at 1.44%.
Lower fee
DACE 0.28% p.a.
Higher yield
XX20 1.44%
Larger fund
XX20 $225m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric DACE
Dimensional Australian Core Equity Trust - Active ETF
XX20
First Sentier ex-20 Australian Share Fund Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
—
Tracks index
S&P/ASX 300 Index
—
Categories
AU, Factor, Value, Small-Cap
AU, Active
Listed since
2006 (20 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
—
$225m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.28%
0.75%
Dividend yield
—
1.44%
Franking
80%
55%
Turnover
20%
38%
Tax drag 0.48% 1.14%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
—
-27.9%
net
3-year return
—
1.2%
net
5-year return
—
-3.8%
net
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
20.1%
Volatility (5y)
—
21.8%
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

DACE Dimensional Australian Core Equity Trust - Active ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: MQAE, A200, and IOZ.
XX20 First Sentier ex-20 Australian Share Fund Active ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (187th of 189).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between DACE vs XX20?

DACE and XX20 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. DACE carries the lower management fee (0.28%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - DACE vs XX20?

DACE has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus XX20 0.75%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

XX20 pays the higher at 1.44%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

XX20 is the larger fund by assets ($225m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?