Grow it · ETFs

CUIV vs VVLU

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing CUIV and VVLU. VVLU has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, VVLU has the higher 5 years return at 13.4% a year, and CUIV offers the higher at 16.53%.
Lower fee
VVLU 0.28% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
VVLU 13.4% p.a.
Higher yield
CUIV 16.53%
Larger fund
CUIV $736m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric CUIV
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Value Active ETF
VVLU
Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Vanguard
Tracks index
MSCI World ex Australia Value Index
Categories
Intl, Value, Factor, Active
Intl, Factor, Value
Listed since
2017 (9 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$736m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.97%
0.28%
Dividend yield
16.53%
5.2%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
Tax drag 5.29% 2.5%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
6%
net
20.8%
net
3-year return
8.9%
net
18.5%
net
5-year return
2.1%
net
13.4%
net
10-year return
2.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
10.5%
Volatility (5y)
13.1%
Volatility (10y)
12.2%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.47
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.1
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CUIV ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Value Active ETF
  • High 16.53% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 10 years (92nd of 108).
VVLU Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF
  • Top-12% returns over 5 years (23rd of 188 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CUIV vs VVLU?

CUIV and VVLU are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VVLU carries the lower management fee (0.28%). Over 5 years, VVLU has delivered the higher total return (13.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - CUIV vs VVLU?

VVLU has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus CUIV 0.97%.

Which has performed higher - CUIV vs VVLU?

Over the past 5 years, VVLU has delivered the higher total return at 13.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CUIV pays the higher at 16.53%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

CUIV is the larger fund by assets ($736m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?