CFLO vs INCM - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing CFLO and INCM. INCM has the lower management fee at 0.39% a year, CFLO has the higher 1 year return at 15.1% a year, and INCM offers the higher at 5.06%.

Lower fee

INCM 0.39% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

CFLO 15.1% p.a.

Higher yield

INCM 5.06%

Larger fund

INCM $106m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	CFLO BetaShares Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	INCM BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index
Categories	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic, Dividend
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$26m	$106m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.4%	0.39%
Dividend yield	3.03%	5.06%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	—
Tax drag	0.97%	1.62%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	15.1% net	9.9% net
3-year return	—	16.1% net
5-year return	—	12.2% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	8.7%
Volatility (5y)	—	10.8%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	1.3
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.82
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CFLO BetaShares Global Cash Flow Kings ETF

Top-19% returns over 1 year (62nd of 318 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: WDIV, ZYUS, and INCM.

Full CFLO analysis →

INCM BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Top-17% returns over 5 years (33rd of 189 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.39% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: SYI, VHY, and WDIV.

Full INCM analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CFLO vs INCM?

CFLO and INCM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. INCM carries the lower management fee (0.39%). Over 1 year, CFLO has delivered the higher total return (15.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - CFLO vs INCM?

INCM has the lower management fee at 0.39% a year, versus CFLO 0.4%.

Which has performed higher - CFLO vs INCM?

Over the past 1 year, CFLO has delivered the higher total return at 15.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

INCM pays the higher at 5.06%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

INCM is the larger fund by assets ($106m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

CFLO vs WDIV CFLO vs ZYUS INCM vs VHY INCM vs WDIV INCM vs SYI INCM vs ZYUS INCM vs UYLD

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.