Grow it · ETFs

BTXX vs VBTC

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing BTXX and VBTC. VBTC has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, VBTC has the higher 1 year return at -51.1% a year, and BTXX offers the higher at 0%.
Lower fee
VBTC 0.45% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
VBTC -51.1% p.a.
Higher yield
BTXX 0%
Larger fund
VBTC $233m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric BTXX
DigitalX Bitcoin ETF
VBTC
VanEck Bitcoin ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
Tracks index
Categories
Thematic
Thematic
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$33m
$233m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.49%
0.45%
Dividend yield
0%
0%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
Tax drag 0% 0%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-51.8%
net
-51.1%
net
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BTXX DigitalX Bitcoin ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
VBTC VanEck Bitcoin ETF
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IBIT.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BTXX vs VBTC?

BTXX and VBTC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VBTC carries the lower management fee (0.45%). Over 1 year, VBTC has delivered the higher total return (-51.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BTXX vs VBTC?

VBTC has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, versus BTXX 0.49%.

Which has performed higher - BTXX vs VBTC?

Over the past 1 year, VBTC has delivered the higher total return at -51.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

BTXX pays the higher at 0%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VBTC is the larger fund by assets ($233m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?