Grow it · ETFs

BGBL vs ZILR

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing BGBL and ZILR. BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, BGBL has the higher 3 years return at 16.9% a year, and ZILR offers the higher at 14.02%.
Lower fee
BGBL 0.08% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
BGBL 16.9% p.a.
Higher yield
ZILR 14.02%
Higher risk-adjusted
BGBL Sharpe 1.23 (3y)
Lower volatility
BGBL 9.9% (3y)
Larger fund
BGBL $4.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric BGBL
BetaShares Global Shares ETF
ZILR
Ziller Global Fund Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Categories
Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Intl, Active
Listed since
2021 (5 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$4.7bn
$13m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.08%
1.53%
Dividend yield
1.17%
14.02%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
5%
Tax drag 0.49% 4.49%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
10.7%
net
-22.6%
net
3-year return
16.9%
net
8.2%
net
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
9.9%
22.1%
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.23
0.28
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF
  • Top-20% returns over 3 years (45th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.08% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
ZILR Ziller Global Fund Active ETF
  • High 14.02% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (301st of 308).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BGBL vs ZILR?

BGBL and ZILR are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BGBL carries the lower management fee (0.08%). Over 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return (16.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BGBL vs ZILR?

BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, versus ZILR 1.53%.

Which has performed higher - BGBL vs ZILR?

Over the past 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return at 16.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ZILR pays the higher at 14.02%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BGBL is the larger fund by assets ($4.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?