BGBL vs WXOZ - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing BGBL and WXOZ. WXOZ has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, BGBL has the higher 3 years return at 16.9% a year, and WXOZ offers the higher at 6.01%.

Lower fee

WXOZ 0.07% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

BGBL 16.9% p.a.

Higher yield

WXOZ 6.01%

Higher risk-adjusted

BGBL Sharpe 1.23 (3y)

Lower volatility

WXOZ 9.7% (3y)

Larger fund

BGBL $4.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF	WXOZ State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	State Street
Tracks index	Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index	—
Categories	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap, ESG
Listed since	2021 (5 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$4.7bn	$778m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.08%	0.07%
Dividend yield	1.17%	6.01%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	5%	—
Tax drag	0.49%	1.92%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	10.7% net	7.8% net
3-year return	16.9% net	15.8% net
5-year return	—	11.3% net
10-year return	—	13.1% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	9.9%	9.7%
Volatility (5y)	—	11%
Volatility (10y)	—	10.8%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.23	1.15
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.74
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	1
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF

Top-20% returns over 3 years (45th of 226 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.08% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Full BGBL analysis →

WXOZ State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware ETF

Top-17% returns over 10 years (18th of 108 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full WXOZ analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BGBL vs WXOZ?

BGBL and WXOZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WXOZ carries the lower management fee (0.07%). Over 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return (16.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BGBL vs WXOZ?

WXOZ has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus BGBL 0.08%.

Which has performed higher - BGBL vs WXOZ?

Over the past 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return at 16.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WXOZ pays the higher at 6.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BGBL is the larger fund by assets ($4.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

BGBL vs VGS BGBL vs IWLD BGBL vs HGBL BGBL vs VGAD BGBL vs IHWL BGBL vs DGCE BGBL vs AVNG WXOZ vs VGS

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.