Grow it · ETFs

BBAB vs IGB

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing BBAB and IGB. IGB has the lower management fee at 0.18% a year and IGB offers the higher at 2.6%.
Lower fee
IGB 0.18% p.a.
Higher yield
IGB 2.6%
Larger fund
IGB $430m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric BBAB
BetaShares Geared Short Australian Government Bond Complex ETF
IGB
iShares Treasury ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
iShares
Tracks index
Bloomberg AusBond Treasury 0+ Yr Index
Categories
Bonds, AU, Active
Bonds, AU
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$4m
$430m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.98%
0.18%
Dividend yield
2.6%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
30%
Tax drag 0.72% 1.55%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
0.4%
net
3-year return
2.9%
net
5-year return
-0.8%
net
10-year return
1.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
4.2%
Volatility (5y)
5.8%
Volatility (10y)
5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BBAB BetaShares Geared Short Australian Government Bond Complex ETF
  • A 0.98% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
IGB iShares Treasury ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Low volatility (4.98% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
  • Has lagged most peers over 10 years (104th of 108).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BBAB vs IGB?

BBAB and IGB are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IGB carries the lower management fee (0.18%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BBAB vs IGB?

IGB has the lower management fee at 0.18% a year, versus BBAB 0.98%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IGB pays the higher at 2.6%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IGB is the larger fund by assets ($430m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?