ASUS vs FAIR vs GRNV vs IESG - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing ASUS, FAIR, GRNV, and IESG. IESG has the lowest management fee at 0.09% a year, IESG has the highest 5 years return at 6.3% a year, and GRNV offers the highest at 3.62%.

Lowest fee

IESG 0.09% p.a.

Highest 5 years return

IESG 6.3% p.a.

Highest yield

GRNV 3.62%

Highest risk-adjusted

IESG Sharpe 0.26 (5y)

Lowest volatility

IESG 14.2% (5y)

Largest fund

FAIR $1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	ASUS Ausbil Active Sustainable Equity Fund - Active ETF	FAIR BetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF	GRNV VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF	IESG iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	BetaShares	VanEck	iShares
Tracks index	—	Nasdaq Future Australian Sustainability Leaders Index	MSCI Australia IMI Select SRI Capped 5% Index	MSCI Australia IMI Custom ESG Select Index
Categories	AU, ESG, Active	AU, ESG	AU, ESG	AU, ESG
Listed since	—	2017 (9 yrs)	2022 (4 yrs)	2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$403m	$1bn	$250m	$607m
Cost & income
Management fee	1%	0.49%	0.35%	0.09%
Dividend yield	1.36%	3.13%	3.62%	2.55%
Franking	70%	65%	75%	75%
Turnover	45%	22%	30%	15%
Tax drag	1.24%	0.94%	1.09%	0.62%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	-4.2% net	-12.7% net	-4.2% net	-3.2% net
3-year return	11.6% net	4.6% net	10.1% net	10% net
5-year return	4.5% net	1.2% net	5.8% net	6.3% net
10-year return	—	—	7% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	13.2%	13.3%	12.9%	12.1%
Volatility (5y)	14.7%	14.5%	14.3%	14.2%
Volatility (10y)	—	—	14.6%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.59	0.1	0.5	0.51
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.14	—	0.23	0.26
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—	0.38	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ASUS Ausbil Active Sustainable Equity Fund - Active ETF

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (270th of 318).

Full ASUS analysis →

FAIR BetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (295th of 318).

Full FAIR analysis →

GRNV VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF

Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.62% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (269th of 318).

Full GRNV analysis →

IESG iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF

Low-cost: a 0.09% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (263rd of 318).

Full IESG analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ASUS vs FAIR vs GRNV vs IESG?

ASUS, FAIR, GRNV, and IESG are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IESG carries the lowest management fee (0.09%). Over 5 years, IESG has delivered the highest total return (6.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - ASUS vs FAIR vs GRNV vs IESG?

IESG has the lowest management fee at 0.09% a year, versus ASUS 1%, FAIR 0.49%, and GRNV 0.35%.

Which has performed highest - ASUS vs FAIR vs GRNV vs IESG?

Over the past 5 years, IESG has delivered the highest total return at 6.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

GRNV pays the highest at 3.62%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

FAIR is the largest fund by assets ($1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

FAIR vs ETHI FAIR vs VAS FAIR vs RARI FAIR vs VETH FAIR vs E200 GRNV vs ETHI GRNV vs VAS GRNV vs RARI

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.