Grow it · ETFs

ARMR vs BNKS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing ARMR and BNKS. ARMR has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, BNKS has the higher 1 year return at 46.1% a year, and BNKS offers the higher at 5.36%.
Lower fee
ARMR 0.55% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
BNKS 46.1% p.a.
Higher yield
BNKS 5.36%
Larger fund
ARMR $225m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric ARMR
BetaShares Global Defence ETF
BNKS
BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Global Defence Index
Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Banks Currency Hedged AUD Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
2024 (2 yrs)
2024 (2 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$225m
$187m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.55%
0.57%
Dividend yield
2.15%
5.36%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
30%
Tax drag 1.29% 2.44%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-1.4%
net
46.1%
net
3-year return
34.5%
net
5-year return
20.4%
net
10-year return
13.9%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
13.5%
Volatility (5y)
16.8%
Volatility (10y)
19.2%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.99
Sharpe ratio (5y)
1.01
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.67
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ARMR BetaShares Global Defence ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
BNKS BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF
  • Top-1% returns over 5 years (2nd of 188 ETFs we track).
  • Pays a useful 5.36% income yield.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ARMR vs BNKS?

ARMR and BNKS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ARMR carries the lower management fee (0.55%). Over 1 year, BNKS has delivered the higher total return (46.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - ARMR vs BNKS?

ARMR has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, versus BNKS 0.57%.

Which has performed higher - ARMR vs BNKS?

Over the past 1 year, BNKS has delivered the higher total return at 46.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

BNKS pays the higher at 5.36%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

ARMR is the larger fund by assets ($225m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?